Saturday, December 13, 2014

Montgomery County Officials Quoted Opposing M-83

We've created this short info-graphic to show what officials said on the 2014 campaign trail. Quotes are from scorecards, forums, emails and social network posts (printable PDF).

Montgomery County, Md Officials Quoted Opposing Mid-County Highway Extended (M-83)

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Seneca Valley Trout Unlimited Becomes A TAME Coalition Supporter

The Coalition for Transit Alternatives to Mid-County Highway Extended (TAME) announces that Seneca Valley Trout Unlimited (SVTU) Chapter has signed on with TAME's 50+ organizations and elected officials to stop further planning, design and construction for Alternatives 4, 8 & 9 in the Midcounty Corridor Study of Mid-County Highway Extended (known as M-83). 

SVTU is a local voice of Trout Unlimited. TU's vision statement is to conserve, protect and restore North America's coldwater fisheries and their watershed. One way SVTU supports TU's national vision is: to help with maintenance activities on Little Seneca Creek in Montgomery Co., southern Catoctin brook trout streams in Frederick Co., and maintenance of warmwater streams like Great Seneca Creek and areas of the Potomac River.

TAME Coalition supports multiple, viable and sustainable transportation alternatives as solutions to replace the old Mid-County Highway Extended (M-83) plan; and is working with Maryland's state and local elected officials, as well as with MNCPPC Planning Board, to remove M-83 from the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways.

Montgomery County Department of Transportation's (MCDOT) Draft Environmental Effects Report (EER) strongly favors building the 50-year-old-designed highway on alternatives with the highest bio-diverse areas and in the densest sub-urban neighborhoods of any of the original 11 alternative alignments (Alternatives 8 and/or 9). Their Draft EER acknowledges an additional nine intersections will fail county congestion standards after construction. MCDOT lists the cost of the proposed 6.2 mile highway to be $350 million. After mitigation costs are added, the total price tag is expected to double. 

MCDOT's proposed M-83 Alternatives 8 & 9 (from Montgomery Village Avenue to Rt. 27) do not align on any existing road, and will negatively impact 16 stream and wetland crossings, including Wildcat Branch (Class III natural trout reproducing stream) near Butlers Orchard, and parts of Dayspring Creek ecosystem adjacent to Dayspring Silent Retreat Center and the 300 acre North Germantown-Greenway Park.  These two alignments are made up of 90% forest, wetlands and pristine parkland, which would be irreversibly eliminated and paved over, if M-83 were built. The overall effect from deforestation of nearly 100 accumulative acres of mature ecosystems will drastically increase sediment loads in the Seneca Creek watershed, making it impossible to lower sediment levels mandated by the state. 

Transportation solutions (for north-south traffic) supported by TAME Coalition focus on:

Transit Alternatives
  1. Mass transit along existing roads being seriously considered as a viable and sustainable alternative
  2. Dedicated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lane along MD 355
  3. Building the Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT) from Shady Grove to Clarksburg 
  4. Increasing MARC Train to full service, adding a third track
  5. Finishing Metro's Purple Line from Rockville to Silver Spring (east/west traffic)
  6. Transportation solutions benefiting all citizens in Montgomery County
Traffic Demand Management Solutions
  1. Traffic demand management being seriously considered on existing roads 
  2. Encouraging more carpooling and vanpooling
  3. Bus lanes on I-270 during peak periods
  4. Better traffic signal operation
  5. Upgrade intersections
  6. Ramp metering

Join Us

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Come Experience a Bus Rapid Transit Vehicle at Montgomery County Fair!

We hope you’ll join us (corrected date) Monday, August 11th for a press event with County Executive Ike Leggett and more at our booth at the Montgomery Agricultural Fair!
View this email in your browser

Come Visit Us at the Montgomery Agricultural Fair

Dear TAME Coalition Supporters,
CFT would love to show you a real Rapid Transit vehicle!

Communities For Transit is delighted to announce that we are bringing a new Bus Rapid Transit vehicle to this year's Montgomery County Agricultural Fair! Along with the vehicle, we will be bringing large, interactive displays and raffles, and we'll be located right next to the main ticket booth, where thousands of residents will pass through!

We are even organizing a press event with County Executive Ike Leggett, members of the County Council, and many others to show their support for the Rapid Transit System. We'd love to bring out as many supporters as we can to show the rest of the county and state that Montgomery County is dedicated to its transit futureClick here to RSVP!

What: Bus Rapid Transit Press Tour at the Agricultural Fair
Who: County Executive Leggett, Montgomery County Councilmembers, other elected officials, Communities for Transit staff, County transportation staff
When:  (corrected date) Monday, Aug. 11th at 10:30am
Where:  Communities for Transit exhibit space next to main ticket windows at the Agricultural Fair (Perry Parkway entrance).

Please RSVP for the press event here.

Even if you can't attend the press event, we'd love if you and your family or friends would stop by Communities for Transit's space when you come visit the fair!

Montgomery County Agricultural Fair
August 8-16
16 Chestnut St, Gaithersburg, MD
Get directions to the Main Fair Entrance!

Please share this email with any groups or individuals who may be interested!
We can't wait to see you there!

Communities for Transit
8630 Fenton St, Suite 500
Silver SpringMD 20910

Add us to your address book

(301) 273-3081

Join TAME Coalition at the Ag Fairgrounds for the 
Press Event with County Executive Ike Leggett on 
(corrected date) Monday, August 11th.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Council Chairman Requests McDOT To Study Transit-Alternative to M83



May 12, 2014

Mr. Isiah Leggett
County Executive
101 Monroe Street, 2nd Floor
Rockville, MD 20850

Dear County Executive Leggett,

​As Chair of the Montgomery County Council’s Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy & Environment Committee, I am writing to request that under your direction, the Montgomery County Department of Transportation study the development of a transit-based alternative to the Mid-County Highway Extended, otherwise known as M83.

The focus of the initial Clarksburg Master Plan was to develop a transit-oriented community.  To that extent, the study, when undertaken by the Department of Transportation, should examine alternatives that would utilize existing roadways, comprehensive traffic moving strategies, such as signal timing and intersection improvements, and various combinations of transit options. 

            One such transit option that I request be included in the study should be a Bus Rapid Transit line running from Clarksburg to Bethesda, which would utilize the cross-section of Alternative 5.  This alternative called for a widened MD-355. This would mean not having bus service lanes, but instead a median corridor in which buses would travel. This approach is similar to Rockville Pike South approach where the Department of Transportation had originally planned bus service lanes, but altered their plans to median corridors.

            Other alternatives for consideration include express bus service along I-270 to the MARC and Shady Grove Metro, and all day, two-way service on at least the inner portion of the Brunswick Line. This approach would be concurrent with MARC’s Growth and Investment plan.

This study must also address and answer important questions about how transit alternatives would be impacted following the completion of the Clarksburg Town Center and what effects this may have on the estimated number of daily trips. It is also extremely important that this study take into account and model the Corridor Cities Transitway and its impact on Clarksburg’s development.

Thank you again for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response to this issue.


                                                     Roger Berliner
                                                     Transportation, Infrastructure
                                                     Energy & Environment Committee

Join Us

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Majority of MoCo Council Say: Transit Options Instead of M-83

“I do believe our council has adapted a transit-first mentality,” said Roger Berliner (D-Dist. 1) of Bethesda on Tuesday. “When you look at the cost of M-83 [the extension], it is so significant compared to other priorities.”A majority of the present nine-member County Council appears to support construction of a transit system to connect Clarksburg to down county jobs and shopping instead of spending more than $350 million on an extension north of the Midcounty Highway.
The county is picking up the total cost of extending a highway from Gaithersburg to Clarksburg. As of right now there is no additional planning money and no construction money in the Fiscal Year 2014 budget, pending responses from the environmental agencies.
There is also associated environmental damage with proposed route, which some critics say can’t be entirely mitigated.
If built as proposed the M-83 would be a 5.7-mile highway from Montgomery Village Avenue to Ridge Road east of Interstate 270. Though the final design and route has not been set, it’s been described as a four-lane road.
Some Clarksburg residents take the opposite view, saying they moved to the suburban area expecting the highway to be extended north.
“Our quality of life and our mobility is greatly reduced if that road doesn’t get built,” said Doug Reimel, who moved from Rockville to the east end of Clarksburg Village near Md. 27 about a year ago.
“The roads around here are already gridlocked— Md. 355 out of Clarksburg, 27 is very bad, and I-270 is typically jammed,” said Reimel, who also cited commuter traffic coming south from Carroll County.
Brian Donohue of Clarksburg is a member of the appointed Upcounty Citizens Advisory Board, which meets regularly in Germantown about issues affecting the north end of the county.
“We’re like an island by ourselves,” said Donohue, who drives to work in Rockville. “We want to be connected to everybody else.”
A majority of the Upcounty board voted seven in favor of M-83, with two against and two abstaining at a meeting on April 28 with not all members present.
Advocates on both sides of the issue are making the debate over the M-83 extension an election issue as council members and County Executive Isiah Leggett head into the Democratic and Republican primaries on June 24.
However, it will be the winners of those elections who will vote whether to move forward toward building M-83, probably late this year or early next following review of the county Department of Transportation’s preferred highway route by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Maryland Department of the Environment.
“We’ll know if the state agencies have approved the preferred alternative toward the end of this year or early 2015,” said Edgar Gonzales, deputy director for department of transportation, during an April 21 session of the Councils’ Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment committee headed by Berliner.
At that meeting, Berliner said he wanted assurance from the county’s Department of Transportation that it has looked at every transit option conceivable, including additional bus lanes on Interstate 270, not just the various routes suggested for the M-83 extension.
“Over the time that’s gone on, hopefully there’s been an evolution in our thinking,” said Berliner, who questioned whether a highway, first put into the master plan in 1960, still makes sense.
Council Vice President George L. Leventhal (D-At Large) of Takoma Park agreed.
“I am opposed to the construction of M-83 as we simply cannot afford it,” wrote Leventhal in an email to The Gazette. “At a projected cost of at least $350 million, M-83 would be three times more expensive than the most expensive transportation project in the County’s current six-year capital budget for transportation.”
He and Councilman Philip M. Andrews (D-Dist. 3) of Gaithersburg, who is running for county executive, said proposals for the Corridor Cities Transitway, a bus rapid transit system along Frederick Road, upgraded intersections and reversible lanes on I-270 are better options.
Also supportive of transit are council member Hans Riemer of Takoma Park, who wrote in a letter to constituents that he supports a bus rapid transit route along Md. 355 between Clarksburg and Gaithersburg, expanded bus service to the bus rapid transit system and intersection upgrades.
“I have not supported M-83 for both environmental and cost reasons,” wrote at-large member Marc Elrich of Takoma Park in an email to The Gazette on Tuesday. “I believe we should complete the CCT to Clarksburg town center and complete the proposed BRT line up 355, and then we should look at what road enhancements we need.”
At-large Council member Nancy Floreen of Garrett Park said Tuesday that the issue has suddenly become politicized because the primaries are coming up.
The county-based Transit Alternatives to Mid-County Highway Extended Coalition, which opposes construction of M-83, has recently talked with most council members about their positions.
Reimel, meanwhile, said he and his neighbors in Clarksburg Village are also keeping opinions about M-83 in mind as the primary approaches.
“This is a planning exercise that we’re in the middle of and it’s being turned into a political exercise, which it shouldn’t,” Floreen said. “We’ll be listening to the facts and listening to the community [at a future hearing], and we’re not at that point yet.”

JOIN TAME Coalition as we work with citizens, organizations and government to build Transit Alternatives to Mid-County Highway Extended.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Candidates Forum Tonight! Come Support our Councilmembers Opposing M-83

This forum is a great opportunity to show support to those County Council members who are opposed to building M-83, and to talk with other Council members who haven't yet joined our movement. Your presence will be so appreciated.  In this past month, much is happening through many council members to eliminate M-83 from the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways, and to work on solutions to replace M-83 with multiple, viable and available transportation systems.  

The majority of the County Council Members are on record as opposing building M-83:
Marc Elrich, At-Large
George Leventhal, At-Large
Hans Riemer, At-Large
Roger Berliner, Dist. 1
Phil Andrews, Dist. 3
Candidate Forum Sponsored by: 
Clarksburg Civic Assn & Greater Goshen Civic Assn

County Council Candidate Forum

Wednesday May 7, 7PM
Cedarbrook Community Church
23700 Stringtown Road

All At-Large and District 2 candidates for the Montgomery County Council have been invited.

District 2 includes the Clarksburg, Germantown, Goshen, Damascus and Montgomery Village areas.

The forum will start with 1 1/2 hours of moderated questions and timed answers from all candidates.

The questions will be selected from those submitted by attendees.  All questions should be written and succinct so that they can be reaonably answered in 2 or 3 minutes.  Candidates have been asked to stay after the formal question period for informal discussion.

Directions: Take Brink Road to Route 355 and continue on to Stringtown Road.  Turn right and continue through the stop sign at Snowden Farm Parkway.  Turn left at the first drive after the stop sign. The church is set back from the northwest corner of Stringtown Road and Snowden Farm Parkway.

Join TAME Coalition as we work with citizens, organizations and government to build Transit Alternatives to Mid-County Highway Extended.